Missionary Journal

 October 13, 1970

Brother B. talked about stewardship at his “Living Prophets” Lecture last Wednesday.(Institute)

Stewardship is a responsibility for something we do not own.  Scripturally it is mentioned in         D& C 72, 100 and parts of 70.  God has given us stewardship over three important things:  our bodies; our minds; and our spirits.  It might also be noted that actually we “own” nothing (except for our intelligence, and we’re not sure about that.)  Our bodies have been called the “temple of God.”  In the creation our Heavenly Father created our Spirit from intelligences (Heavenly Mother played her role too.) Intelligences are: 1) matter; 2) eternal; 3) not created; 4) cannot be destroyed; and 5) have agency.

 Even Christ was owned by the Father and he turned his agency over to the Father. “Whose I am, even the Father.” (D&C 19:1)

It seems to be an everlasting principle that our ego must be satisfied.  There is a righteous way; ie desire to be clean and acceptable before God; and an unrighteous way or the other way: ie to be acceptable before other people.  (Keep this in mind when vertical and horizontal stewardship are discussed.)

We do not do our will, but the will of Christ, and even He has openly acknowledged his stewardship.  A beautiful solution to the “I” problem is to go through the gospels and note Christ’s commitments to God.  In D&C 104 the law of consecration is discussed (vs. 11) Our stewardship increases eternally; it is immeasurable.  “All things are mine” (vs 14).  He owns it all and He’ll provide  “in my own way.”

We cannot magnify our stewardship without the Holy Ghost or else we are doing it “our way” and not His.  Note the following Mosiah 2:25, D&C 38:16, Mosiah 4:22.

Brother B. suggested that we are always tempted before great challenges, (or) increase in stewardship.  Note the three temptations of Christ:

1)      Rocks to bread- physical – hunger

2)      Call on angels – show a sign- mind- appeal to intellect

3)      Offered the world – worship Satan – spirit- selfishness

Selfishness is the plague of the spirit.  Ego is part of that spirit.  There are three basic relationships amongst men:  fathers, sons, and brothers.  Your superiors, your peers, and those whom you have responsibility for. 

Using Moses 5:1;2, Brother B. suggest Chauncy Riddle’s *concept of “Brother’s Keeper.”            Are we, are we not?  The Answer is : We ARE NOT!  Think of the definition of keeper.                 A zookeeper assumes complete responsibility for his animals.  Their agency has been given to him.  Cain assumed Christ’s stewardship by killing Able.  He had no right to take Able’s life-        it was not his. (note here: blasphemy is a form of insubordination).  Let’s look at this graphically in terms of vertical and horizontal stewardship.  Man owes his allegiance to God not men.           He has obligation to those over him and responsibilities to those beneath him.  He has no authority over those on his own level.  The patriarch is a steward over his son (“brother”) who is steward over the “son”.  Neither brother or son have stewardship over other brothers or sons. 

There must be good[lr1]  correlation always but without proper authority correlation falls through.

Notice, our government cannot act as a universal helper since it doesn’t have that stewardship. We cannot be our brother’s keepers – only our brother’s lovers. (government     loves man more than God) Note also that our Constitution actually promotes Stewardship. 

 One girl mentioned the greatest act of love would be to lead a person to their proper steward.  Want to help someone? Put him in his stewardship.

The Beatitudes set up stewardship.  First, we must serve God and then serve man. 

Nephi recognized his stewardship (1Nephi: 17). 

Now priesthood correlation seems more important than ever.  It’s a “perfect” organization after the patriarchal order.

 My work in this area is rapidly coming to a close.  I’ve already packed much of my stuff.  Wednesday we’ll travel the district.  Thursday we teach J., R., and the H’s.  We also have Family Home Evening.  Elder G. has been a good companion.  He hasn’t always been easy to get along with.  He mocks my seriousness and sober attitude.  It’s not that he’s frivolous.  He seems to enjoy being a foil to his companions.  He knows his material, but beyond the basics, he has not been inspired to study.  He has started to read “Jesus the Christ”.  G. asks a lot of questions and answers only a few.  He gets to know his companions.  Having been raised in a large family of strong Mormons, he has always expected to go on a mission.  His testimony is simple and strong.  Its greatest challenges has been met here on his mission.  As a leader he is learning empathy and strength of position.  His strong suit is adaptability.  He can adjust to situations.  His leadership has made Lewiston district “go”:  When he fuses his ability to adapt with decisive sure footedness, he will be an even better leader.

I seem to have precluded any chances of early leadership.  I’ll be in the Lamanite Program for at least 2 or 3 months.  I do not want to “wash out.” I hope I am capable of handling the choice Lamanite Spirits.  This seems to be a fulfillment of the calling I felt I had from the prophet Enos.  I read Elder D.’s article in this month’s Pathfinder.   His reaction to appointment to the Indian program was much like mine.  Shock and momentary disappointment.  I’ve been labeled as a spiritual missionary.  This will be my test.

President W. visited us on Sunday.   He informed us of the transfers.  My heat was in my throat.    I love it here in Moscow.  In a private conversation I explained my feelings about Moscow and leadership.  The President explained how he wanted to strengthen the Lamanite program and how he was going to need new leaders there.  Does he want me as a Lamanite DL? It was good    to know he had confidence in me.  I needed that desperately.

I’ve met some choice people here in Moscow.  D. M and L.J.M. probably stick foremost in my mind.  These two PNM RM’S ware really fired up on missionary work.  Both are converts of only a year when they came out.  Both came from rugged, hard lives into the light of the gospel.

C. W. has touched my heart.  She’s such an enthusiastic little girl.  Often she’s too ready to offer advice or promote her ideas, but her desire is to promote the work.  She is very spiritual most of the time and when
she can’t maintain the (spiritual)plane she wants to, she becomes very depressed.  The institute is lucky to have her working for them. 
D. and C. have great ideas about baptismal services.  Maximum involvement.  All the students are involved.  C. prepares a Book of Remembrance and has each guest sign it.  Between the baptism and the confirmation, the students bear their testimonies.  It’s choice.  After the baptism, there is a reception at the Institute.  This is a casual, friendly gathering.  Refreshments are served, there is entertainment, and the Book of Remembrance is presented.  A photographer records the baptism and the Book of Remembrance presentation. 

Chauncy C. Riddle

 [lr1]
“His Father in Heaven asks Cain, “Where is Abel thy brother?” and Cain fires back, “I know not: Am I my brother’s keeper?” (Genesis 4:9)  Maybe the answer to that question is—as Professor Chauncey Riddle once said to me—”No, Cain, you are not expected to be your brother’s keeper.  But you are expected to be your brother’s brother.”  (On Earth As It Is in Heaven, p. 142) J. Holland


Chauncey Cazier Riddle graduated from Brigham Young University and received his MA and PhD degrees in philosophy from Columbia University in the city of New York. He taught at BYU for 40 years, serving as Professor of Philosophy, Chairman of the Department of Graduate Studies in Religious Instruction, Dean of the Graduate School, and Assistant Academic Vice President.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Missionary Journal April 8th, 1970

Missionary Journal March 21, 1970

Missionary Journal 1970